Corrections Policy

Last updated: May 27, 2026

Upon Review aims to publish accurate, grounded, and transparent sports analysis. We correct factual errors when they are identified and verified.

What we correct

We will review correction requests involving:

• Incorrect scores, dates, teams, players, substitutions, lineups, standings, or game events.
• Incorrect statistics or misread source data.
• Misattributed quotes, reports, images, or sources.
• Claims that overstate what the available evidence supports.
• Broken or incorrect source links.
• Missing context that materially changes the meaning of an article.

What may not require a correction

We do not usually issue formal corrections for:

• Reasonable differences of interpretation.
• Minor style preferences.
• Predictions or opinions clearly presented as opinions.
• Later developments that were not known at the time of publication, unless the original article becomes materially misleading.

How to request a correction

Email [email protected] with:

1. The article URL.
2. The specific sentence, claim, stat, or graphic at issue.
3. A short explanation of the problem.
4. A reliable supporting source, if available.

How corrections are handled

When we verify a material factual error, we will update the article and, when appropriate, add a correction note explaining what changed.

For minor typos, formatting errors, or non-material wording fixes, we may update the article without a formal correction note.

Editorial uncertainty

Sports analysis often includes interpretation. When a claim is inferential rather than directly observable, Upon Review should use careful language and avoid pretending to know a player’s, coach’s, or manager’s internal intent unless a reliable source supports that claim.